As
each day passes, more and more Americans are becoming aware
of the startling evidence that clearly contradicts the official
explanation of Sept.11th, 2001 offered by the Bush administration.
In fact, as more and more evidence comes to light, incongruities
in the official explanation become increasingly and undeniably
apparent.
Ironically,
the growing number of people new to these unexplained discrepancies
poses a new problem for those of us who have been researching
9/11 for many months or years. We will have to find a way
to explain the many complexities related to the attacks to
those who now doubt the official version of events. We are
faced with the overwhelming task helping great numbers of
people understand the many contradictions in the 9/11 story
they were fed by their government.
Obviously,
that is not an easy assignment, even when the great majority
of truth seekers agree that the official explanation is little
more than a pre-written cover story designed to herd the American
public into supporting an agenda that would otherwise horrify
and outrage them. However, it becomes far more complicated
in light of a topic that causes a great deal of confusion
within the research community itself. That disparity relates
to the strike on the Pentagon.
Many
questions still remain about what actually took place at the
Pentagon on September 11th 2001. That’s fine, because the
goal of the 9/11 truth community is to raise these questions
for further investigation. The problem arises when researchers
feel that it is their responsibility to explain what happened
at the Pentagon. It is NOT. Rather, it is their charge to
highlight the doubts that have been legitimately raised regarding
what exactly hit that building.
Some
researchers claim that a 110,000 ton Boeing 757 hit the building,
leaving only a 16 foot hole in the facade (prior to its collapse
some 22 minutes after the initial impact.) Others claim that
an A-3 Skywarrior fighter jet was the actual aircraft. Some
say it was an unmanned Global Hawk armed with depleted uranium
missiles, and still others claim that the Pentagon was hit
by another type of military missile. We can argue each of
these theories forever, and accomplish absolutely nothing.
We
really have to put and end the internal dispute that is getting
us nowhere and work together to bring information rather than
more uncertainty to the public that is now just entering the
9/11 discussion. To that end, I am posing ONE pertinent question
about the strike on the Pentagon: Why didn’t they show us
the wreckage?
Planes
do not simply vaporize. Never in the history of aviation disasters
has an aircraft ever totally disintegrated. Even exploding
space shuttles did not vanish into thin air. Therefore, it
stands to reason that whatever hit the Pentagon had to leave
some recoverable debris in its wake. Surely, there had be
enough identifiable rubble remaining from a 110 ton aircraft
to satisfy the skeptics? There is no way to convince me that
the few scraps of metal and small engine parts, which according
to some researchers are not from a 757, are proof of anything.
at all. Neither am I convinced that the handful of uninformative
photos that were released were not staged by the people who
planned this event. An 110,000 tons aircraft has to leave
more convincing evidence than what we have been offered. I
defy anyone, anywhere to recreate a plane crash in which110
tons of aircraft are reduced to a select few, barely identifiable
parts.
Why
was this most important event in America’s history not fully
documented by camera crews? Why wasn’t this event filmed and
analyzed to its fullest extent for historical and forensic
purposes? Why weren’t standard crime scene procedures followed,
and why were government officials permitted to tamper with
and eventually collect and secrete all of the crime scene
evidence? Last time I looked, tampering with or destroying
crime scene evidence was a felony. Why wasn’t every inch of
the scene photographed by official investigators prior to
the recovery process?
There
is ample evidence of government complicity in the events of
September 11th 2001, but nothing is more suspect than their
relentless effort to prevent the public from examining the
evidence. The cover up may actually speak louder than the
actual evidence of complicity. That in itself may be the most
important thing to consider in all of this intrigue and mystery.
It
is too late now for the Bush administration to make good and
show us the evidence. They have had 5 years to create a library
of fabricated films and images. By this time, they actually
could have produced a hanger full of faux plane wreckage.
We needed to see the evidence at the crime scene at the time
of the crime. We did not, and the troubling question remains
unanswered: why didn’t they show us the wreckage?
Even
without the mounting evidence of their involvement, nothing
aside from time travel into the past will remove the aura
of government complicity in the events of 9/11. Nothing at
all can remove the cloud of suspicion that hangs over this
administration because of its undaunted and obvious efforts
to keep essential evidence at the Pentagon site hidden from
the public.
One
side note regarding the actions of a novice pilot attempting
to hit the Pentagon: If you were throwing a dart at a toilet
seat, would you aim at the side of the seat or would you aim
down at the top of the seat, you know…the part that many men
try to avoid hitting? Any pilot - especially a less skilled
one - looking at the Pentagon as the target of a projectile,
surely would have planned a simple, top-down, dive-bomb approach.
The Pentagon is shaped like a set of of toilet seats, one
smaller than the other, each one residing in the void of the
next larger. The side of the Pentagon is 77' high yet the
topside surface target space is approximately 29 acres. What
would anyone reasonably aim for - a 29 acre target or the
relatively miniscule one - on the ONLY reinforced section
of the building designed to withstand a frontal attack?
I
offer this as another common sense question left out of the
discussion by the people who continue to stand by one of the
most unbelievable fairy tales ever sold to the American public
since the JFK magic bullet story. It is another QUESTION,
not an answer, in the long line of questions no one in any
official capacity has been willing to listen to, never mind
answer.
In
conclusion, I repeat that we have to stop trying to ANSWER
the questions that have been raised. Instead, we have to collectively
demand the answers. Even more constructively, we must focus
on the essential questions that absolutely needs to be answered.
In the case of the Pentagon, where is there any concrete evidence
of the remains of a 110 ton Boeing 757 among the wreckage
at the scene? Why didn’t they collect, examine and reveal
the wreckage to the public? Why, why, why didn’t those in
charge of finding out what happened at the Pentagon show us
the wreckage? We think we know.
Think
about it. Jesse - Editor, TvNewsLIES.org
Posted
by Jesse on Sunday, April 16th, 2006 at 6:21 pm.
