|
|
If you doubt the possibility
that the U.S. government "Black" projects engineers have he
ability to secretly construct an underground tube-shuttle system,
think again. Here is a quoted article that appeared in the Los
Angeles Times newspaper on June 11, 1972. It is an interview
with the lead physicist at the RAND corporation "think tank"
about how economical, technologically achievable and environmentally
friendly such a Very High Speed Transit (VHST) network would
be if work on it were begun.
|
LA
TIMES, JUNE 11, 1972
BEGIN ARTICLE
QUOTE"
L.A. to N.Y. in Half an Hour?
10,000 - M.P.H. Tunnel Train Plan Developed
By:
Times Science Writer - George Getz

A
Rand corporation physicist has devised a rapid transit
system to get you from Los Angeles to NY in half an
hour for a $50 fair.
He said existing technology made such a system
feasible and so does a cost analysis. The essence
of the idea is to dig a tunnel more or less along
the present routes of U.S. highways 66 and thirty.
The tunnel would contain several large tubes for East
West travel of trains that float on magnetic fields,
moving at top speeds of 10,000 mph. Passengers
would faced forwarded during acceleration, backward
during deceleration. According to R. M. Salter
Jr. head of the physical sciences department at Rand,
the idea of high-speed train travel using electromagnetic
suspension was first put forward in 1905 and actually
patented in 1912. The trains he suggested now
would be single cars rather than actual trains, and
would be big enough to carry both passengers and freight,
including large containers and automobiles.
Could
Carry Automobiles
The cars,
or gondolas, would leave the New York and Los Angeles
terminals at one minute or even 30 second intervals.
On the main line their would be intermediate stops
at Amarillo and Chicago. Feeder lines would meet the
main lines at both locations. Their would also be
subsidiary lines coming into the two main terminals
from such cities as San Francisco, Boston and Washington.
The main idea of VHST, or Very High Speed Transit,
developed originally in thinking about the satellite
program and hyper sonic aircraft speeds." Salter said
in an interview at Rand. "The underground tubes were
for suggested as alternatives, perhaps not quite seriously,
but it was soon apparent that the idea of a tunnel
containing such tubes had a lot of real advantages."
he said.
Conservation
of Energy
In the
first place, he explained there is the extremely important
matter of the use and conservation of immense amounts
of energy needed to move the vehicles at such great
speed. "An airplane that travels faster than sound
uses up a large part of its available energy supply
just in climbing to an altitude where the speeds for
which it is designed are possible." Salter said. "That's
true of rockets to. Much of their energy is spent
and lost forever and getting above the atmosphere."
This would not be true for the VHST gondolas traveling
on their electromagnetic rail beds, according to Salter.
The tubes would be emptied of air, almost to the point
of vacuum, so the trains would not need much power
to overcome air resistance. They would not even have
to be streamlined. In addition to an electromagnetic
roadbeds, the opposing electromagnetic loops of wires
in the floors of the gondolas would be super cooled
with liquid Helium to further eliminate electrical
resistance.
Breaking
Generates Power
Just
as important, the gondolas would, like old-fashioned
trolley cars, generate power as they break to a stop.
"Since the trains would be leaving New York and Los
Angeles simultaneously every minute, the power
generated by cars breaking coming into the terminal
would be transferred to the power lines propelling
the cars going the other way." "For example, there
will be halfway points between each stop. Trains would
use power and getting to that halfway point, and generate
power going the other half of the way to the stop.
Each would use power generated by trains going in
the other direction." That is the way trolley cars
have operated for eighty years - taking power from
the overhead lines while accelerating or running along
at a steady speed, and putting power back into the
lines while breaking or coasting. The big drawback
to the Salter scheme is the cost of tunneling across
the nation. He admitted that it would be expensive
but it does not daunt him. "After the tunneling was
finished, everything else would be practically free."
He said. Even at the low fair he proposes, the enormous
debt created by the tunneling would be amortized within
a reasonable period if the number of passengers and
the amount of freight came up to Salter's expectations.
He figures the tunnel's would carry seven or 8 million
tons of freight a day and that passengers would take
to traveling back and forth between the Eastern West
Coast has readily as they now fly between San Francisco
and Los Angeles. "The technology of this is much
easier than was developed for the space program."
Salter
said. And tunnels, he added, need not be
so expensive to dig is people think. The most
expensive thing about surface routes is the acquiring
right-of-way and removing buildings that stand on
the chosen route. The tunnel would not incur this
expense. The tunnel, besides carrying tubes for passenger
and freight gondolas, would carry many of the utilities
now strung across the countryside on high wires. Salter
said these underground power "lines" could be super-cooled
with helium, like the electromagnetic loops in the
floors of the gondolas. He said this would so reduce
resistance that power could be transferred from one
end of the country to the other without appreciable
loss. At the present time long distance transportation
of power is difficult because of the amount of energy
wasted. He said laser beams could be carried in the
tunnel for the instantaneous transmission of messages.
Even the mail could go cross-country in pneumatic
tubes carried in the tunnel. All this would save money
and speed amortization, thus cutting the overall cost
of tunneling. Salter said approximately 8000 miles
of tunnel were dug in America and Western Europe in
the 1960s. That includes mine shafts. But he said
existing tunneling technology could be vastly improved.
Salter said many tunnels are dug nowadays almost as
they would have been in the dark ages. Drilling holes
in tunnel faces, and using machines with rotary bits
are methods of tunneling that can be improved, according
to him. He said the tunnel could be worked on from
a great many "faces," for instance. Salter suggested,
too, that electronic beams or even water be used to
drill holes for blasting. The high-powered electrons
would drill blasting holes almost instantaneously.
Travel
by Airplane
Projections
of future airplane and automobile travels in the United
States, and the future train and truck transfer of
freight, show that Salter's tunnel idea is not
a science fiction fantasy. There will be more
room in the tunnels for all the necessary transport
than there will be over any feasible number of Airways
and freeways and tracks. Salter's suggestion, according
to the experts who have had a look at it, is an eminently
practical one for handling all the necessary traffic
cleanly and without clogging up the air and surface
pathways. But it will such a system ever be developed?
Salter himself is not optimistic. "Perhaps" is how
he puts it. "I am not nearly so optimistic about the
political aspects of the problem as I am about our
technical capability of doing the job." He said. "History
shows that some obviously feasible and practical projects,
such as the tunnel proposed over and over again for
connecting England and France under the English channel,
can be put off for centuries because of political
pressure. On the other hand, societies with relatively
primitive technology can perform such engineering
feats as the erection of impairments." Is the VHS
T too far out? Salter suggested that to get the right
perspective we should look back 100 years.
Comparison
Made
By comparing
transportation a century ago and transportation today,
one gets a better feel for just how practical VHST
is. It appears to be a logical next step,
and much more practical than its alternatives of filling
the highways and Airways with more and more individually
guided vehicles. "This alone is a compelling reason
for the high-speed system." Salter said. There are
others, according to him. "We can't afford any
longer to continue indefinitely to pollute the skies
with heat, chemicals, not to mention noise, or to
carve up the land with pavement." He said. "We
also need to get the trucks and many of the cars off
the highway to make the roads available to drivers
who drive the family car for fun and convenience."
"END
ARTICLE QUOTE |
Additional
RAND - Robert Salter papers regarding Very High Speed Transit
(VHST) or Planetary Transportation (PLANETRAN) systems planning
are available through the RAND links preceding each document
number. (Bold Type: John Rhodes)
RAND
Document No:
P-4874 Year: 1972 Pages: 17
Title:
The Very High Speed Transit System.
Author(s):
Robert M. Salter
Cost:
$ 10.00
Keywords:
Air pollution; City planning; Pollution; Urban transportation
ABSTRACT:
Description of a very
high speed transit (VHST) system operating in its own
rarefied atmosphere in evacuated tubes in underground
tunnels. Most cases considered took less time to go
coast-to-coast
(e.g., 21 min) than
it takes an aircraft to climb to an efficient operating
altitude. VHST's tubecraft
ride on, and are driven by, electromagnetic (EM) waves.
In accelerating, it employs the energy of the surrounding
EM field; in decelerating, it returns most of this energy
to the system. Tunnel systems would be shared by oil,
water, and gas pipelines; channels for laser and microwave
waveguides; electric power lines including superconducting
ones; and freight systems. Environmental and economic
benefits are substantial, and the technology for building
and operating the system exists. 17 pp. |
RAND
Document No:
P-6092 Year: 1978 Pages: 35
Title:
Trans-Planetary Subway Systems: A Burgeoning Capability.
Author(s):
Robert M. Salter
Cost:
$ 10.00
Keywords:
Railroads; Tunnels; Underground structures; Urban transportation
ABSTRACT:
Describes a subway concept called "PLANETRAN"
comprising electromagnetically supported and propelled
cars traveling in underground evacuated tubes, able
to cross the United States in one hour. It is designed
to interface with local transit systems, and the tunnel
complex also contains utility transmission and auxiliary
freight-carrying systems. Tunnels represent a major
problem area and most of the cost. They will be placed
several hundred feet underground in solid rock formations.
It will require advanced tunnel-boring machines, such
as hypersonic projectile spallation, laser beam devices,
and the "SUBTERRENE"
heated tungsten probe that melts through igneous rocks.
PLANETRAN
is rated as a system high in conservation of energy.
For every car being accelerated, there is one decelerating
in an adjoining tube. The decelerating cars return energy
to the system. The tubes have a reduced atmosphere,
making drag losses much smaller than for aircraft. Coast-to-coast
energy costs are expected to be less than $1.00 per
passenger. (Presented at the AAAS Annual Meeting, Washington,
D.C., February 1978.) 35 pp. |
RAND
Document No:
N-3280-AF/NASA Year: 1992 Pages: xxiii, 94 ISBN: 0833020099
Title:
Space and Surface Power for the Space Exploration Initiative:
Results from Project Outreach.
Author(s):
Calvin Shipbaugh, Kenneth A. Solomon, Dan Gonzales,
Mario L. Juncosa, Theodore W. Bauer,
Robert M. Salter
Cost:
$ 7.50
Keywords:
Electricity in astronautics; Space vehicles--Auxiliary--Power
supply; EXTRATERRESTRIAL
BASES --Energy consumption
Note:
RAND/WD-5192-AF/NASA; RAND/N-3283-AF/NASA; RAND/N-3284-AF/NASA;
RAND/N-3287-AF/NASA
ABSTRACT:
This Note describes the findings of the Space and Surface
Power panel, one of eight project panels evaluating
submissions to the Space Exploration Initiative (SEI)
Outreach Program, or Project Outreach. The submissions
screened by the Space and Surface Power panel proposed
systems that can be classified into at least one of
five technical areas: (1) power generation (solar power,
nuclear power, fuel cells, batteries, and "other"),
(2) power transmission, (3) energy storage, (4) thermal
management, and (5) handling. The panel screened 167
submissions and selected the 22 highest-ranked ones
for further analysis. The submissions that appeared
to offer the best overall potential dealt with nuclear
power sources, power beaming, the development of in-situ
resources (including the use of solar dynamic power),
and thermal management. Some lower-ranked submissions
also contained interesting and potentially useful system
concepts, and the authors evaluated some concepts not
suggested in the submissions, including rechargeable
high-energy density batteries, high-speed flywheels,
and superconducting storage rings. A number of space
and surface power issues became apparent and were examined
by the panel members: (1) environmental implications
of SEI power systems, (2) use of in-situ materials,
(3) nuclear vs. non-nuclear power, (4) start-up vs.
evolutionary power needs, (5) manned vs. unmanned system
requirements, and (6) development of new power transmission
methods. |
| JR
Note: This
document regarding extraterrestrial power supplies,
co-authored by R. Salter, is included for your review
in advance of one question. Could Salter have been advocating
the idea of sending remotely controlled "Subterrene"
TBMs to the Lunar or Martian subsurface [ahead of time?]
to melt [airtight!] tunnels in which later arriving
astronauts could live and work in? Furthermore, couldn't
the Subterrene power-packs be used after underground
construction for powering regular underground base operations?
It would seem a logical and economical approach (surface
bases require re-enforced materials that are imported
from Earth. What an expense that would be!) |
DISCLAIMER:
I make
no claims for the accuracy of this information and express no personal opinion
on the matter. The information was acquired off the web and from authors (owners
of said pages) and other sources and described as "information"
and I wanted to pass it along to anyone who might find it interesting or otherwise
useful. I'd appreciate any feedback you'd care to share with me if you wish
to proceed in a civilized manner. If the work is yours please email me and
we can work something out.
I want to give the author the credit they deserve or remove the piece.
Copyright
Notice
©
1997 - 2006 Think About It Enterprises. All rights reserved.
All material
on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software,
are protected by international copyright and trademark laws. Unauthorized
use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload,
post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this Web Site.
Unless permission is granted.
|
|