| Payday Loans A Straight Talk No Bull Web Site Apply Today / Cash Tomorrow We Deliver! http://www.fastcashonline.com/ |
Payday Loans Fast cash personal payday loans, paycheck and payroll loans and advances. Apply online. http://www.fastcashonline.com/ |
Payday Loans FASTEST CASH ON THE INTERNET! Fast Cash - $100 to $2,500 Overnight No Credit Check - Lowest Rates http://www.fastcashonline.com/ |
Journey to the Earth¹s Interior (JEI)
(Pg.40-50)
Spectrum analysis of the Planetary Nebulae shows them to be composed, not of
groups of stars, but of condensing gases.
(JEI-Pg.47)
³All the nebulae except the spirals have bright-line spectra instead of dark-line
spectra like those of the sun and stars. This shows, in accordance with the
principles of spectrum analysis, that the nebulas are masses of incandescent
gas rather than luminous solids or liquids shining through cooler gases.²
Photographs of planetary nebulae show that they are actually spheres of condensing
gas around a likewise condensing gaseous core. This fits in nicely with the
theory of a Hollow Earth with a central sun. (See Joseph Cater¹s ³The Awesome
Life Force² for an explanation (via soft particle physics) of why this central
mass does not condense into a solid as does the shell.)
(JEI-Pg.53)
³ ŒScientific American¹ - October 14, 1916
ŒFifty of these nebulae (planetary nebulae) have been studied photographically
with the crossly reflector, using different lengths of exposure in order to
bring out the structural details of the bright central portions as well as of
the fainter, outlying parts. Most planetary nebulae show a more or less regular
ring or shell structure generally with a central star.¹ ³ (Quoting Dr. Heber
D. Curtis of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. (Italics mine‹Author))
(JEI-Pg.56-57)
Note: The spiral nebula evolves into the ³shell² nebula, which evolves into
a planet.
Note: The same bright light that ³reflects² from the polar ³ice caps² of Mars
is also seen coming from the polar regions of Venus and Mercury. Of course,
3 different explanations are offered by scientists to explain the same phenomenon
in 3 different places. This seems like pretty weak logic to me. The Hollow-Planet-with-a-Central-Sun
theory seems much more logical, and does, in fact, offer a consistent explanation
of the facts.
(JEI-Pg.100)
³...what Peary discovered was not an actual polar point of solid ice at the
apex of the world, but rather a point which he identified by the compass needle...²
(Look on any globe/map, and you will see that the actual magnetic north pole
is presumed to be located in the vicinity of Northern Canada, and does fluctuate
continually.)
All explorers of the far-north regions noted the warm winds that came from the
north, the gradual increase in temperature as one went north past 80 degrees
latitude, and the warm, ice-free sea that was eventually reached if one went
far enough north.
Note: General Greely stated that, in his opinion, ³The water space to the northward
can only be entered in extremely favorable years by the Spitzbergen route.²
(JEI-Pg.154-155)
The British Association for the Advancement of Science met in Montreal in 1884.
(Reprints of the body of the meeting were published in ŒThe Scientific American¹,
and in many other scientific publications as well.) Greely addressed the meeting
concerning the discoveries of his extensive Arctic explorations.
³Greely remarked that one of the surprises of the journey was his discovery
that the further north he went, the greater the depth to which the ground thawed.²
(JEI Pg.155-156)
Greely also noted that the tides that came in from the north were warmer than
those that came in from the south.
(JEI Pg.248)
ŒOn the Possibility of Approaching the North Pole¹ ‹ Hon. Daines Barrington
³He tells us not only that driftwood is driven on the north coast of Iceland
which could come from no other quarter than the north, but that among other
fresh pieces whole trees were found which yet had their buds on them, something
which would have been absolutely impossible if this wood had drifted long distances
from southern climes. It is obvious that a very few months in salt water would
kill the buds, but here were trees which had evidently been growing only a short
time before.²
(JEI Pg.248-251)
It is noted that many animals come from the north in the spring (in a very fat,
well-fed condition), and return north in the winter.
(JEI Pg.253)
Seeds of plants that only grow in tropical climates are found flowing south
from the northern regions. If these seeds had to come all the way from the tropics
(which is the only place on the exterior that they grow), they would be in such
a poor condition as to be unrecognizable, if they were even still in one piece,
which is very doubtful. Yet the seeds found are always as fresh as if they had
just been separated from their host plant.
(JEI Pg.277-278)
The standard explanation of the Aurora is that it is ³somehow² caused by the
earth¹s magnetism and/or electricity(?). All theories of this type are very
vague.
³If, as some people think, the earth¹s magnetism or electricity at the polar
regions or around the earth¹s magnetic poles were the cause of the Aurora, there
would be a constant relation between its displays and the different instruments
which have been constructed to tell the presence of magnetism and electricity‹the
compass would be affected and the electrometer would be affected.²
Note: The Aurora is sometimes white, and sometimes colored. This indicates that
it is an optical phenomenon. When the atmosphere is in the proper state (moisture
content, etc.), it separates the light into its constituents, much like a prism
(we see this all the time with rainbows).
(JEI Pg.288)
Further proof that the Aurora is caused by a light source, and is not electric
or magnetic in origin:
Taylor Reed, ŒPopular Astronomy¹-1895-Describes the spectroscopic observation
of the Sun¹s corona and compares the result with the examination of the earth¹s
Aurora.
He says: ³ ŒBoth have their beautiful streams. Each has a characteristic form
in the neighborhood of the pole of its sphere. Apply the spectroscope to each
and the analogy is continued. Each gives in the spectrum an unidentified bright
line, with fainter companions. Each shows a faint continuous spectrum.¹ ³
³We cannot imagine what further proof than the above anybody could need. If
the two sorts of light give precisely the same spectroscopic appearances, they
must come from precisely similar sources. That is to say, if the corona is light
caused by a sun, the Aurora must also be light caused by a sun. And that is
what we claim.²
(JEI Pg.290)
³In ŒNature¹, the volume of 1878, will be found an account of the eclipse of
the Sun as observed by the astronomer royal of Great Britain wherein it is stated
that Professor Bass observed steadily for the whole period one part of the Sun¹s
corona, and he found that it pulsated in just the same manner as the Aurora
does.²
(JEI PG.302)
³...in the efforts of these Eskimos to tell where they came from they would
point to the north and describe a land of perpetual sunshine...²
(JEI Pg.347)
³...the heat of the earth¹s crust does not continue the further down we go,
as had always been supposed, but...only holds for a short distance, and then
ceases. And then what?²
Note: Lord Kelvin was the first person to put forward this idea.
(JEI Pg.347)
(Quoting Grew, ŒThe Romance of Modern Geology¹)
³ ŒWe know that the Earth cannot be solid all through because it does not weigh
enough.¹ ³
Note: Diameter of Earth ‹ 8,000 miles
Crust ‹ 800 miles thick
Central Sun ‹ 600 miles in diameter
Distance between central sun and inside of crust ‹ 2,900 miles.
The Phantom of the Poles (POTP)
(Pg.29)
³Why is the earth flat at the poles? Our school books teach that the earth is
round, and flattened at the poles; but they do not tell us why. If the earth
is solid, this question cannot be answered. If the earth be hollow, the question
is easily answered, as it could not be hollow and at the same time round; for
the opening to the interior of the earth would then detract from the roundness
just in proportion to the size of the opening. A ball cannot be made round and
have a hole in it: however small the hole, the ball is not round to that extent.²
(POTP Pg.31)
³The fact that the earth is flattened at the poles is not any proof that the
earth is double, or hollow. It only shows that the shape of the earth is not
only favorable to such a condition, but absolutely necessary, and gives a good
foundation with which to start.²
(POTP Pg.37-38)
³Greely proved that when the needle (of the compass) was suspended on an untwisted
silken thread, it stood pointing nearly straight up. That was at latitude 85
degrees; at 90 degrees it would be erect. That is just what would be expected
if they were nearly at the turning, or at the farthest point north. On the explanation
that the earth is hollow, the needle worked just as it should have, and if it
worked differently, would have been wrong.²
(Refer to Greely¹s book, page 127)
(POTP Pg.54-60 ‹ Summation/Paraphrased)
The ³water-sky² has been known about for many decades, and has even been used
as an accurate method of navigation by noted Arctic explorers. The ³water-sky²
is when, somehow, the land is reflected accurately in the sky. (Perhaps the
polar basin acts as a large concave mirror, and this projects a picture onto
the clouds, etc. in the sky.) Has no-one thought that the Aurora Borealis is
just another example of the same phenomenon; a reflection of a ³fire² (the central
sun) in the center of the earth? Of course they haven¹t, because this would
mean accepting that the earth is hollow. Better that the ³scientists² should
come up with some other vague explanation, such as magnetic or electrical phenomena.
Who cares that such explanations are neither as logical as our theory, nor do
they fit the facts as well. We see in their attempt to explain the Aurora Borealis
the same logic (or lack thereof) applied to the ³ice-cap reflections² of Mars,
Venus and Mercury. The same phenomenon has been witnessed on all three planets
by competent, professional astronomers here on earth, and yet 3 completely different
causes are assigned to it. Come now! This they call logic? Whatever happened
to scientific method: Let the facts prove or disprove the theory; and our theory
is the one that best explains the facts. Not just a few selected facts, as is
true of most ³scientific² theories, but all of the facts.
(POTP Pg.68-69)
³The northern whalers, or those that seek game in that frozen country (the Arctic
Circle), look into the sky in order to tell whether the ice is frozen solid
or whether there are openings. If the sky be a whitish gray, the surface reflected
is covered with ice; if there be patches of blue, they indicate openings in
the ice. Thus, they are able to tell the condition of the earth many miles away.
If that can be done, and it has been proved it can (by all of our Arctic explorers),
why cannot we, when we see what appears to be a fire burning in the sky, know
that there must be a fire beneath? (The central sun.) No reasonable person can
doubt that the same reflection is as true in one case as it is in another.²
(POTP Pg.209)
³Why is the snow colored in the Arctic regions?²
³The snow has been analyzed, and the red, green, and yellow have been found
to contain vegetable matter, presumably a flower, or the pollen of a plant.²
³A flower that produced pollen sufficient to permeate the air with such density
that it colored the snow, would require a vast territory to grow it. Where is
that to be found? If on earth, it must be near the North Pole; for, if it grew
elsewhere, colored snow would be found at other locations, and not be confined
to the Arctic regions. As no such flowering plant is known on earth, we must
look elsewhere.²
(POTP Pg.213)
³...it is impossible for an iceberg to form at any place where it is warmest
at the mouth of the stream or canyon. If it be warmer at the mouth than farther
inland, the mouth would be the last to freeze over, and there would be no water
to pass over the ice to make an iceberg.²
³...the interior of the earth‹back from the mouth of the rivers or canyons‹being
warmer, is just suited for the formation of icebergs. The mouth freezes first,
and the river, continuing to flow to the ocean, overflows the mouth, and freezes
for months, until spring. As the warm weather of summer advances,...the bergs
are thawed loose...into the ocean.²
Note: The tidal waves that take place in the Arctic may well be caused by these
huge bergs plunging into the ocean when they break loose.
(POTP Pg.278)
The north magnetic Pole (or, as the Russians have found in their research, the
north magnetic line ) has been found, and is approximately 500 miles away from
where the actual geographic ³Pole² should be. The south magnetic pole has also
been found, and is approximately 750 miles away from where the actual geographic
³Pole² should be.
The Hollow Earth (THE)
(Pg.19)
December, 1929: ³The memorable December 12th discovery of heretofore unknown
land beyond the South Pole by Capt. Sir George Hubert Wilkins, demands that
science change the concept it has had for the past four hundred years concerning
the southern contour of the earth.²
‹ Dumbrova, Russian Explorer
(THE-Pg.19)
February, 1947: ³I¹d like to see that land beyond the (North) Pole. That area
beyond the Pole is the center of the Great Unknown.²
‹ Rear Admiral Richard E. Byrd (U.S. Navy)
(THE-Pg.20)
January, 1956: ³On January 13th, members of the United States expedition accomplished
a flight of 2,700 miles from the base at McMurdo Sound, which is 400 miles west
of the South Pole, and penetrated a land extent of 2,300 miles beyond the Pole.²
‹ Radio Announcement from Byrd¹s Antarctic expedition, confirmed by the American
Press of February 5, 1956.
(THE-Pg.20)
March, 1956: ³The present expedition has opened up a vast new territory.²
‹ Rear Admiral Byrd, on March 13, 1956
(THE-Pg.44)
³The United States and more than thirty other nations prepared unprecedented
polar expeditions for 1957-1958 to penetrate land now proved to extend beyond
both Pole points.²
Note: ŒOperation Highjump¹‹(1946-1947), South Pole.
(THE-Pg.60)
³The total surface of the Earth is 197 million square miles and its estimated
weight is six sextillion tons. If the Earth was a solid sphere (or filled with
a heavy substance such as molten iron), its weight would be much greater. This
is one among other scientific evidences of the fact that the Earth has a hollow
interior.²
(THE-Pg.98)
³The Bible, the Book of Enoch, and ancient writings of the Chinese, Egyptians,
Eskimos, Hindus and others tell about the great opening in the north.²
(THE-Pg.75)
Professor Henrique Jose de Souza ‹ president of the Brazilian Theosophical Society
(Headquarters are in Sao Lourenco in the State of Minas Gerais.) The professor
lectures on the Hollow Earth Theory.
Commander Paulo Justino Straus ‹ officer of the Brazilian Navy and member of
the Directoria of the Brazilian Theosophical Society. He also lectures on the
Hollow Earth Theory.
(THE-Pg.179)
There is supposed to be a tunnel in the Roncador Mountains of Northeast Matto
Grosso that leads to the interior of the earth. (Colonel Fawcett and his son
supposedly used this tunnel to enter the inner world.)
The Isle of Avalon ‹ Lies on the Œother side of the mists¹; sun always shines
hazy; associated with immortality. All very similar to conditions described
in the Earth¹s interior.
(THE-Pg.226)
Santa Catarina, Brazil ‹ Tunnels in great numbers that lead to the interior
are said to honeycomb the earth beneath this part of Brazil.
Secret of the Ages (SOTA)
(Pg.74)
Quote from the Bible (Book of Job)
³He stretcheth out the north over
the empty place, and hangeth
the earth upon nothing.
He bindeth up the waters in his
thick clouds; and the cloud is not rent
under them.
He holdeth back the face of his
throne, and spreadeth his cloud upon it.
He hath encompassed the waters with
bounds until the day and night come
to an end.²
‹ Job 26: 7-10
(SOTA-Pg.77)
³It is interesting that the Van Allen belts, zones of intense radiation surrounding
the earth,... have gaps at both polar areas.²
(SOTA-Pg.125)
³The South Polar opening is in the region on the map of Antarctica called ŒThe
Area of Inaccessibility.¹
³There are no bases in ŒThe Area of Inaccessibility¹, though the Russians have
one on the edge.²
(SOTA-Pg.130)
³It is incredible that out of the 17 U.S. polar experimental rocket shots, only
two gave the expected result when a specific factor was introduced ‹ a definite
change in procedure which deliberately avoided a course directly over the pole.²
³All cones released directly over the North Pole (or from a precise polar orbit)
were lost. On the other hand, all cones released over Alaska and the nearby
Œpolar area¹ were picked up.²
(SOTA-Pg.132-133)
(Descriptions of Satellite photos) ‹ Depict approximately 40% of the globe.
#1) ESSA-7 satellite ‹ Nov. 23, 1968 ‹ Shows circular polar opening at the North
Pole (no cloud cover; rare)
#2) ESSA-3 satellite ‹ Jan. 6, 1967 ‹ Earlier photo shows the North Polar opening
with only a slight cloud cover, giving a more diffused effect, but still clearly
visible.
(Both of these photos are official photographs provided by the Environmental
Science Service Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.)
#3) NASA Photo # 67-HC-723 ‹ ATS-111 satellite
(taken from 23,000 miles; shows entire globe from an equatorial, or side, view.
The lip of the North Polar entrance is clearly visible.)
#4) Another photo from the ATS-111, taken from the NASA Publication: ³Exploring
Space with a Camera.²
Nov. 18, 1967 Photo ‹ At equator, approximately 47 degrees West.
This photo also shows, quite clearly, the lip of the North Polar entrance.
The Smoky God (TSG)
(Pg.11)
³ ŒHe is the God who sits in the center, on the navel of the earth, and he is
the interpreter of religion to all mankind.¹ ²
‹ Plato
(TSG-Pg.35-36)
The ŒNorwood Review of England¹ - May 10, 1884
³ ŒWe do not admit that there is ice up to the Pole ‹ once inside the great
ice barrier, a new world breaks upon the explorer, the climate is mild like
that of England, and, afterward, balmy as the Greek Isles.¹ ²
(TSG-Pg.111)
³The electrically surcharged condition of the air was a constant vitalizer.
I never felt better in my life than during the two years my father and I sojourned
on the inside of the earth.²
NOTE: See Joseph Cater¹s work for reference on this.
(TSG-Pg.117)
³I have since discovered that the language of the Inner World is much like the
Sanskrit.²
(TSG-Pg.117-119)
Talk of a mono-rail car using gyroscopic stabilization.
(TSG-Pg.131)
³By some device which I cannot explain, they held communion with one another
between the most distant parts of their country, on air currents.²
NOTE: This book was published in 1908, when such things as radio and gyroscopically
stabilized mono-rails had not yet been conceived by scientists on the outside
of the planet.
Etidorhpa (EDP) ‹ Published 1895
(Pg.17)
³The Lola map shows a large field of sink-holes about where I calculate the
entrance to the ŒCave of Zoroaster¹ to be.²
³Some investigation of the stream sources and of springs in this area may turn
up some very interesting things.²
Note: The area spoken about above is the Lola Quadrangle of Livingston County,
Kentucky.
There is a reproduction of the map of this area in ŒEtidorhpa¹. An original
(and perhaps more up-to-date/accurate?) copy may be obtained by writing to the
appropriate department of Kentucky¹s state government.
(EDP-Pg.83)
³When the boat landed at Smithland, Kentucky, a village on the bank of the Ohio
(river), Just above Paducah, we disembarked...²
(EDP-Pg.85)
This page shows a map of where the ŒCave of Zoroaster¹ is supposed to be.
(EDP-Pg.84)
Reference is made to a Mr. Joseph Watts, a wealthy land owner near the Cumberland
River, with whom ŒI am the Man¹ and his captor stayed.
(EDP-Pg.87-88)
These pages speak of ŒBiswell¹s Hill¹, a landmark in relation to the location
of the ŒCave of Zoroaster¹.
(EDP-Pg.89-92)
The Cavern Fields of Kentucky are discussed. The entrance to the underworld
is purported to lie within these fields, and a general idea of its position
is given.
(EDP-Pg.99-103)
Speaks of the river that flows into the cavern; describes the path to be taken
on the journey inward (downward?).
Note: Very little food need be taken into the cavern, because food is abundant
after a day or so of travel. However, a light source of considerable range and
brightness that is capable of being waterproofed will be needed, as will diving
and climbing gear. (i.e.-air tanks, ropes, spikes, etc.)
(EDP-Pg.107)
³Misguided men will torture science by refuting facts with theories; but a fact
is no less a fact when science opposes.²
(EDP-Pg.125)
³...matter is not food, but a carrier of food.²
³What is food?²
³Sunshine. The grain of wheat is a food by virtue of the sunshine fixed within
it.²
(EDP-Pg.331)
On this page is given a map of the entire route taken, from Kentucky to the
end.
(EDP-Pg.334-335)
Soliloque concerning the life of man on surface earth; very short; constant
struggle for physical existence; very little effort able to be devoted to developing
higher mental faculties.
(EDP-Pg.343-344)
The ŒSphere of Rest¹ is described. It may be wise to bring along a small jet
thruster (or canister of compressed air?) with which to move oneself. It is
stated that one may accomplish this my Œmental force alone¹, but I don¹t believe
it would be in anyone¹s best interests to learn the hard way that his/her Œmental
force¹ was not sufficient for locomotion. Spending the rest of your life hanging
weightless at a fixed point in space doesn¹t strike me as the best way to advance
one¹s knowledge.
(EDP-Pg.362)
³...many of the statements [contained in this book, Etidorhpa] are of such a
nature as to be verified easily, or disproved by any person who may be inclined
to repeat the experiments suggested, or visit the localities mentioned.²
(EDP-Pg.375)
³Would you not be surprised to know that from above your atmosphere the sun
is invisible? Light is earth-bred.²
Note: In their trips to the moon, our astronauts did note that, after leaving
the earth¹s atmosphere, the stars disappeared. A striking parallel may be drawn
from this fact with the theory of ŒMoongate¹, a book concerning NASA¹s suppression
of the true facts gleaned from our space program. (Which WAS publicly funded!)
The astronauts mentioned on several occasions that it was Œgood to see the stars
again¹ when they reached an orbit around the moon. This should tell us that
conditions on/around the moon may not be as different from those of Earth as
NASA would have us believe. For further reference, see the related papers on
the space program cover-up.
The Awesome Life Force (ALF)
(Pg.18)
November 10, 1967 issue of ³Life² shows North Hole. (Photo was taken by the
ŒDODGE¹ (Department Of Defense Gravity Experiment) satellite, 18,100 miles above
the equator.)
(ALF-Pg.77)
September, 1982 issue of ŒScience Digest¹ shows Venus¹ (north?) polar opening.
[Photo is from ŒPioneer Orbiter¹ satellite.]
(ALF-Pg.77)
Nov.-Dec., 1982 issue of ŒPlanetary Report¹ shows a series of pictures covering
Venus¹ entire surface (also taken by the Venus Orbiter) which shows the (south?)
polar opening.
Note: The April, 1989 issue of ŒDiscover¹ magazine shows a picture of Venus
on the cover that is sure to astound anyone familiar with the Hollow Earth Theory.
Venus is shown with a Œhole¹ at its northern axis. The pictures were created
by radar mapping techniques. The explanation for the Œhole¹ is that they ran
out of money. (??)
This explanation is ridiculous on the face of it. The had enough money to map
the entire planet, but couldn¹t afford to do a tiny piece at the top. In any
case, government projects of this sort never Œrun out of money¹, they Œgo over
budget.¹ The actual dollars and cents of everything isn¹t sorted out until after
the project is completed. (That is the difference between a government project
and a government-funded project: when they run out of money, they Œgo over budget¹.
When a government-funded project (i.e.-someone working on a project under a
government grant) runs out of money, it runs out of money.
The second problem with the Œwe ran out of money¹ explanation is blatantly apparent
upon first looking at the photograph. The Œradar mapping¹ process was carried
out from here on earth. At any one time, we only see the side of Venus that
faces us. We Œradar map¹ the Œdisc¹ that presents itself to us. When Venus¹
angle in relation to us changes, we radar map a different Œdisc¹. When, eventually,
all of the Œdisc¹ maps are put together, we would have a very nice, rather accurate
3-D representation of Venus. Let¹s say we Œran out of money¹ before we could
complete the project, and were forced to create a composite using only the data
that had been completed so far. Can you get a mental picture of what that would
look like? I bet you can, and I also bet that it looks nothing like the ŒVenus
with an empty circle at the top¹ that is displayed on the cover of the April,
1989 issue of ŒDiscover¹.
Note: There have been claims made that the earth¹s north pole has been photographed
by infrared cameras that can Œsee through¹ the perpetual cloud-cover that exists
at the north Œpole¹. This is a blatant attempt to misguide and misinform the
common man. It is a well-known fact (as can be verified by asking anyone with
even a basic working knowledge of physics and/or the principles involved in
infrared (thermal) photography.) Infrared photography through a perpetual cloud
deck is impossible. There is too much moisture and soaking up of thermal signatures.
So if anyone poses this argument against the Hollow Earth Theory, and you happen
to be involved in the conversation, please enlighten whoever may be listening.
Moongate
(Picture Section)
A photo from the ATS-111 satellite is shown. (NASA photo 67-HC-723) It was taken
in 1967 from 22,300 miles above Brazil. Having been taken from an equatorial
position, it shows the lip of the northern polar entrance quite clearly.
The following is a list of people/groups that are concerned with the Hollow
Earth Theory.
Bruce Walton
Box 1942
Provo, Utah 84603
1-801-377-1748
(In 1983, Mr. Walton was close to completing a regional guide to underworld
entrances.
The Hollow Earth Society of Kentucky
Director: (And Editor of ŒThe Hollow Earth News²)
Dennis Feebacks, Sr.
791 Ridgeview Drive
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601
1-502-227-8183
also:
Joe R. Gatewood
715 Timothy Drive
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601
1-502-227-4458
National Speleological Society, Inc.
Cave Ave.
Huntsville, Alabama 35810
³The Hollow Earth Association²
Box 15198
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80935
Mary Davis
Mary Martin (Director/Editor of ŒThe Hollow Hassle¹ Newsletter)
³The Rainbow Earth Dwelling Society²
4843 Memory Lane Apt. #4
Salt Lake City, Utah 84117
L. Christine Hayes (Director/Editor [translator] - ŒThe Source¹ Newsletter)
³Shavertron²
P.O. Box 1708
San Anselmo, California 94590
Richard Toronto (Director/Editor - ŒShavertron¹ Newsletter)