Review based on the work of Randolfo Rafael Pozos

Report by Greydon Moore

Discovery of an ancient civilization on Mars.

Reference: THE FACE OF MARS – by Randolfo Pozos
Evidence for a Lost Civilization, Chicago Preview Press, 1986.

Studied this afternoon under the views of virtual stereo 3-D so that Mars topology became stereoscopic and more sharply detailed in a brighter faceted light. Here is some of what was seen, a witness from PACE present confirming the study.

The face on Mars is not a face. Massive constructions of an abandoned ancient civilization most certainly are, and they are awesome here are construction features made of solids just not known in human legacies of ancient Earth. One of the sites has gigantic constructions made of stone that look like technology. Not at all Egyptian. No sites or structures are Egypt-like, in fact. The intelligence that made them is entirely unlike Egyptians or the Pyramid ages, and not like any known remnant human orders of ancient eras, neither Chinese, African, or Aztec or Mayan, neither South America ruins in the Andes, nor hieroglyphs miles long on the Nazca Plains. Any of these legacies are not seen, in architecture legacies on Mars as so far captured in photo by satellites.

It was/is a different culture intelligence entirely, but an intelligence not unlike ours gearing to technological demands. A pentagram is however a main feature in one of the major sites yet this is not from human history class. Today’s history class is the American military Pentagon. Ancient history class is golden rectangle Parthenon’s of Greece. The Pentagram of stone on Mars is both the inner five sided polygon and star tips from a five sided star as well, the tips representing a star rotated 1/5th turn around the inner pentagram and to still have point angles of 36 degrees, the base of one point clearly adjoins two adjacent sides of the main 5 sided pentagram, other points are indicated but not stark as if stamped in iron like the one point cited above.

In other words, some of the remains are very well preserved, in that precise details are self evident, not like Hebrew archeology trying to make an alter of Abraham from a rudimentary pellet of rock found near the top of a naked barren hillside.

Ancient history is as naked as the hills of Dover, when seen in virtual stereo details on Mars, some nonetheless so buried that old age is deeply forecast.

Who can say how old.

Some of the remains seem very weather worn, but all of them are covered with crescent-based dunes gently curving to the top, with a complete weather made topological 2nd side, the LEEWARD side cleaned of deposit by a difference in Bernoulli principles due to difference in gravity, difference in air pressure and atmosphere (compared to Bernoulli’s of Earth) allowing more than enough vortex on the leeward side of the wind to suck out all lightweight material, so that solid vertical wall faces and facades of great height are exposed in vertical walls seeming cleared all the way down to their bottoms, but only on the leeward side except in structures which have a central cavity surrounded by curved and straight vertical walls and in particular walls joined at sharp angles in cleared inner parts, surrounded by burried outer reaches.

Objects large and small, peppering the sites, and of many angular shapes, and which look like cuneiform writing incised in clay, are not writing at all, they are vertical facades kept free of deposit on the leeward sides, the vertical walls so tall that in cases where the walls join at right angles, or angles of 5 and 6 sided geometry, the shadow of the leeward face creates the cuneiform impression in 2-dimensional photos. In stereoscopic view, the peppering of cuneiform clearly reveals how extensive the sites can be, massively high some of them, and how heavily buried, and in places how very weather worn and eroded some of the architecture actually is. This could be very ancient stuff, here, very ancient.

This does not mean to say they cannot be recent for instance in a time era on par with the end of the Earth’s last ice age, when Earth modern archeology seems to have started and little to nothing of it now remains.

On Mars, decay damage such as by earthquakes or avalanches seems to be in rare rather than a norm, very little damage can be seen, rather, mostly, burial. Some artifacts are so well conserved they are as if brand new, though brand new is not true in obvious ways.

The ‘F A C E’ does not appear to exist. Co-incidences of shadows, and some crumpled terrain, are the extent of the features. Bearing in mind also the consistency of left to right leeward wind clearing of all settlement, and foreside depositing coming right up over the top of buried structures.

The ‘face’ could have been a giant curved structure originally, now well worn and mostly buried except for the exposed leeward side (the dark half) however this dark half is not a vertical wall face as seen in the ‘cuneiform’ remains, this ‘dark side’ of the face is filled with sloping decay rubble as from more than one avalanche, in fact one major avalanche down a facade face at a distinctly angled facet relative to the main leeward downside slope, to indicate artifact remain is standing there rather than random Mars topology.

But this remain is definitely not anthropomorphic, definitely not made in the image of human deity. This artifact, otherwise known as ‘the Face’ is totally devoid of either personality or persona. It is just another architectural structure among many, and harder to infer than many others due to decay damage and co-incidental shadows.

Close your bibles please.

Something else is there, it is seen nearby, having a practical purpose when made, an ancient race or species coping with an urgent situation. Water.

You will see in a moment as you read on.

Regards ‘the face’:

Its nose, (something indicating a nose) is a co-incidence of shadow plus a tiny pit on a slight knob, the supposed nose itself nothing but a mere irregularity along a top crescent, of miniscule proportion in 3-D compared to the rock mound as a whole. There is no human nose made in the image of man or woman. Trying to look at the miniscule tiny bump on the high crest is laughable, it pushes the giggle button. It would be like having a head of any ordinary sized statue lining the street, stuck on the body of the Sphinx in Egypt. The Sphinx’s head is pinhead enough already.

The eye with pupil is a bit mysterious because there is some kind of a hole going straight down within a dark diamond shaped cavity but there is no brow-ridge or carefully crafted overhang, instead is seen irregular seeming inside opening, more the characteristic of geology changes, nothing of thoughtful deliberate intelligent intent regards a so seeming eye made by the wrought of sculpture.

There are no facial features.

Reference to: THE FACE OF MARS – by Randolfo Pozos, Evidence for a lost Civilization, Chicago Preview Press, 1986.

Change the word lost to ‘abandoned’ is more the say about it.

Turning to page 104 (NASA satellite frame 084A73) a whole new concept in species thought takes hold.

THIS structural enterprise is handsomely exposed in its center parts, and it is ENORMOUS. Look to a round spot of light at the top of a long tongue running up the inner center of the frame. All you need to do is grasp the IMPACT of a gigantic round stone sphere sitting out in the open on a horizontal platform at the top of a long steep ramp, to realize the scope of its domains. To the left, deep down at ground level, is a clear cut pentagram (5 sided polygon) of 5 thin vertical walls and to the left a still visible perfect dart from the points of a 5 sided star, the two hypotenuse sides of the star coming to two corners of the pentagram, the star point of different material texture than the pentagram itself, and both clearly unique to the ground around.

Round balls (spheres) of solid stone up to 6 feet across are sitting all over the place in jungles of Central America on Earth and no one knows where they came from or who put them there or what they were supposed to be for. So, who knows how large the ball on Mars is but conceder the word ‘miles’ perhaps to give scope to the utter bare naked fact of this solid rock carved into an orb in perfect spherical shape. Shadows deep underneath show the orb is not sitting on a flat facet, it is fully round in its underside. A slight difference in texture in upper right sector of the sphere is hard to say but may be a slight flatness in the curved plane. Looking immediately to the left of the steeply rising vertical ramp leading straight up to the stone sphere sitting high up in space and out in the open, is tucked in (almost hiding in shadows) more or less straight down at the base below the orb, a cavity into the base of the wall, and in the cavity are two large round artifacts of stone. Picture two disks from a human spine placed one on top of the other and inserted vertically upright on edge all the way into the cavity. These two objects carved of solid stone are shaped like pin cushions, or better yet, two dumbbell body builders weights with no shaft between, but in fact gives real impression of something a hydro company might create to conquer new challenges in electricity, especially since they are so deliberately carved, with home cavity carved like a cave into the wall face so specifically located under the orb’s platform high above. The two thick objects may in fact be shaped like lozenges sitting far into the cave, just their ends nestled in filling the bottom to the top of the cave to almost completely filling the cave seen at the cave’s mouth.


Hard to say in such above view looking down past the ramp to the available details at the bottom base of the ramp’s side.

The reason for the above hydro remark is an unmistakable impression that the site may have precipitated moisture from the atmosphere by more than one way and steered all flow through a huge rod shaped conduit made of solid rock going underground, including a Niagara valley spill from a giant tall basin to be described within the minute. Not a theory here, just a suggestion about an impression. GM.




To the right of the mighty ramp, tucked at its base well back against a giant curved semicircle high wall of curved mountain side, deep down in the ‘shadows’ of an otherwise huge area, is a rod made of solid stone that ends against an ellipse against another high wall, the ellipse is tilted at a slight angle in two directions so that it was made as a ‘deliberate’ ellipse, deliberately tilted slightly off vertical. Picture a piston with a flat disk at its end. The construction means of the elliptical disk is not clear in the photo because it does not seem to be of totally solid stone per se, almost as if flimsy and of partially veiled see through but who can say at this moment what it is made of or why it seems made of a vague veil-like semi see-through material. One thing is totally clear however, its texture is totally different than the stone comprising the huge short length of circular rod carved out of solid rock it looks that way. In fact the texture of the ellipse is much like diffuse texture in the vertical ramp leading straight to the orb.

No fracture joints can be seen, but this may be a problem of outer space long distance, details fine enough to reveal cracks precisely joined not available in NASA frame 084A73.

Of particular note is that the smooth rod is of a different texture than the mottled towering ‘catch basin’, shortly to be introduced.

It is possible to imagine that this piston shaped artifact is actually a viaduct cut inside through a tube of solid rock and heading straight into the base of a small mountain sized vertical facade, and was carved in the form of a tube so to reduce turbulence to increase the flow so that none backs up or spills, and to give the short length of solid stone pipe extra strength by lack of irregularities that could cause cracks by uneven sunlight plus extreme irregularities in temperature.

The volume of a large river, or more, could have been the amount of water this huge enclosed duct handled.

This concept comes from a reasonably made thought conjunction to the existence of a stupendous catch basin described further below.

Needless to say the mighty ramp itself is also not in original shape. It seems that scouring over eons has worn a depression down its middle so it is slightly like a long wide drain pipe cut in half. But it can easily be supposed that originally it might have been a staircase much in fact like those found in central and south American ruins, and of uniform width bottom to top. The thick rod of pure stone on the other hand, seems intact by available eyesight for the NASA frame photo 084A73. Except for an anomaly, there is no rubble at the bottom of the ramp, so perhaps this ramp WAS a sluice catching water coming from off the giant ORB, except another anomaly, there is no capture trench instantly seen in photo under or around the orb. Hmmm.




It needs to be remarked that some of the whiter areas and touches throughout all of the archeological sites seen in NASA satellite frames are a kind of over layer of deposited material, while other white areas are solid and exposed to reflect more light in the NASA frames.

The difference can be easily seen in stark topology differences in viewing photos of the frames in virtual 3-D stereo. The reason why this is mentioned is because diffuse areas in the frame may not be of entirely different stones or materials, just worn in different ways, or also made with different degrees of surface polish.




For instance, to the lower right in frame 084A73 is a diffuse area that can be made into a large circle by study in 2 dimensional (non-stereo), which has a thin circular trench of slightly darker tone, inside. Picture a bird bath for its most rudimentary design image, a bird bath in which the water is in a circular lagoon (the trench).

In fact the whole artifact interprets as nothing else but a super gigantic catch basin, something from Next Generation Star Trek and beyond. Spock would have something to say about the technology beyond known physics and science, yet, not quite so advanced since concrete or metal is not there in any obvious way. No concrete jungle. No metal devices. And this huge towering catch basin made of solid rock dominating the skyline.

Oh lets see, raise a city the size of Niagara Falls in the air and that might approximate the scale of the catch basin, perhaps an ocean volcano calderas with a lagoon inside and low island in the middle might be the scale.

Perhaps I have inhaled too much burn fumes from chicken grease left roasting in the oven six hours too long hasting to write this eye account of Mars in 3-D. At any rate, get set for awe when you too see the towering catch basin in 3-D.

Assume it was for water, water gathered in a circular trench, spilling over the lip through a narrow trench seen at the top of the circle, except this spillway is probably larger than a standard sized river of Earth. In fact the catch basin is by far one of the largest, and is the highest rising object, in the whole site of 084A73 a site to now call ‘the water works’.

The true perspective revealed as the catch basin, in fact cannot be seen in 2 dimensional images because of its very diffuse nature and seems like a suble ground level irregularity of mottled texture in 2-D planar view its true towering height and phenomenal width not seen at all until subtleties in the surface feature dimness resolve into reaches of towering heights with space in and under the basin itself poised high in the air over the whole of the artificial site.

But this optical dimness is because of the actual material used, not a dust covered domain or overlayed by sand. So high up and into prevailing winds there may be no planetary deposit settled on or around it at all. (Remember – the Bernoulli’s are different on Mars). Shadows resolve into steep slopes and rounded curves going down and around into the underside in 3-D stereoscopics, plus vague differences in texture. Small rills or thin lines, become space-separated and completely distinct, and separate as recognizable in 3-D virtual stereoscopic view.

In fact, yes, a road, not a thin rill, is seen winding up for some distance up the left side of the basin’s stand, but more of this road in a moment.

Why wait:

Try this: a small s-shaped line against the left edge of the diffuse circle is actually a road built alongside and rising in a vertical upward direction in the photo toward the top of the NASA frame, but actually it is very short in distance as seen from such great height from space. Like roads against the sides of mountains in Tibet, a hugh section of this road comprising one of its s-curves has been built out high in space over the valley and ground floor over which, to the right, rises the gigantic catch basin. To repeat once again, the height of the catch basin is by far the tallest structure dominating the entire site, though not in cross sectional area, the pentagram and star tip on level ground far below to the left is more or less as wide.

READ  1998: Star City - A Second Cydonia?

Now, back to the gigantic ball of stone on its horizontal platform at the top of the ascending ramp (which is the main dominating clearly seen artifact in this NASA frame). There are similar spheres of stone all over the place, all of them smaller, some much smaller, for instance comparable golf balls, baseballs, volley ball, and basket ball. These balls, a few of them, are also lying around outside of the main affair, but may be occurred in outer surrounds that are at much more lower elevations and so are buried under heavy deposits, the spherical shape (because of the Bernoulli’s on Mars), preventing over cover of the spheres themselves, the spheres perhaps sitting on high raised ramps or platforms, just assume the spheres most of them are perched rather than lying around like marbles merely scattered aimlessly.

There is in fact a staircase, on the inside by the lower left end of a central dominating white topped curve of solid stone that arcs across the top of the site in NASA frame 084A73.

Only the bottom few stairs are still clear in detail perhaps the others are filled with wind blow deposits.

The mountain cliff structure, a tall walled crescent faced inward to the water basin area, is a high solid wall in a perfect curve. Down its facade is exposed horizontal long layers of well worn rock which have been eroded by moisture weather rather than sand blast, the same kind of eroding which has weathered the base of the Sphinx on Earth, an erosion caused by long term heavy rain, unlike any other erosion marking the Egyptian pyramids and temples which are all sand eroded hence of a later time on Earth. The Sphinx is now thought to be from a time at least 10,000 years ago, because of its water eroded base.

In looking at other NASA photos in the 1986 book titled ‘THE FACE On MARS’ :

In fact – fracture lines in some surrounds at one site, are in fact real legit fracture fissures going deep into surface as normal, but others are horizontal weather wears ‘slicing’ flat into under edges of solid constructions at ground level, even though both fissure and horizontal slices look the same in 2-dimensional photos. In virtual 3-dimensional stereoscopics the fundamental difference between the two kinds of fissure are seen as plain as day. A huge block of monument is sitting on bedrock with a huge slice going along its length horizontally under it.

Back to that face. It appeals to so many because, they say, it looks just like the Sphinx. The Sphinx it is not, it is not a Sphinx planted butt end in the sand, its face staring straight toward you in outer space made to capture your attention in a shocking way. This is not the face of King Osmandeus put all Golden Dawn prophecies aside.

For instance the main difference is:

Egypt’s Sphinx has an Egyption pharaoh’s collar around its head.

The seeming collar on Mars is a rounded peak curving randomly around an irregular area to the left (the supposed features) and on opposite side is collapsed rubble (the dark right) but indications say this is natural rubble but not as from half a face of Mount Rushmore falling off, or a face half hidden in shadows by daylight angled in a Mount Rushmore Photograph.

In virtual stereo 3-D there cannot be seen anything unquestionably artificially chiseled as a face staring straight up or sideways. No face is there unless I’m hallucinating in reverse.

In fact there is little in evidence that seems to be other than Mars topology, except for a hint that here are remains of a structure, now well worn, well buried, and the right hand side collapsed like an avalanche, otherwise it sticks rather high up in the air from ground level but does not have even a pimple for a nose there is none, there is no nose. Perhaps some who look upon the NASA frame wish to see their LORD in this face so sincerely that LORD it becomes, and therefore very biblical or genesis and a heavenly creation, but sorry the lord didn’t leave a picture of himself in this place. No facely icons nor images of human kind nor Karnaks spoil the beauty of the scale and purposed technology of this place on Mars.


An ancient abandoned civilization left abandoned sites of itself on Mars. The scope and heights of the mighty center shown in NASA frame 084A73 make the mightiest works of ancient Greeks and Egyptians seem like slums of Jerusalem in comparison.

Consensus: Since there seems no clear cut evidence of habitat around, it is possible the population lived under ground and built the surface structure for, among other reasons, to capture water in major quantities.

One other thing not yet mentioned about that catch basin structure: it seems possible that it was carved into a topological uprise surface feature and not built up from scratch. The remain of the mound of a shield volcano comes to mind, including the water catch-basin itself because the whole of the wide top of it seems without a slit or crack from being stone made by construction, and the whole of the material comprising the catch basin is uniform in its material all the way around its complete surface area. No Venetian tile-work here. It looks chiseled out of one solid rock body of uniform texture the trench, however, worn in a darker seen way.

It is possible that the huge curved crescent of high wall was built of placed huge rectangles of stone (and so will have vertical weather wear as well as weather wear in the horizontal cracks to be similar in wear to the base of the Sphinx, exposed horizontal layers of sandstone on Earth can have this kind of topology; water weathering in uneven layers stacked.

On the other hand since horizontal layers of the high wall crescent are long (few vertical cracks), it is more likely this was cut into bedrock in what in the beginning was a naturally formed gradual sloping bump on the surface miles across.

Well, actually, picture building a new telescope on Mount Kilauea in Hawaii by excavating (carving) a major sunken calderas into its shallow sloping yet high rising cone.

On the other hand don’t be misled by this first report in 3-D stereoscopics, the scales reported are based on perceived sensing of long distant stereoscopic depths rather than facts, due to a lack of any useable external frame of reference. The ‘water basin’ artifacts may be small, except, the road which winds in an s-shape up the left hand side of the basin is a thin string compared to the wide catch basin trench and Niagara valley spill way over its rim, meaning that the water trench could be at least as wide as a major river of Earth, and since even major rivers of Earth are, most of them when seen by satellite, just strings until reaching deltas, picture the Mars water bowl and trench as that much more colossal. Except for the fact that the NASA frames are zoomed in the reproductions.

There is nothing fore soothing the civilization long gone. It may be long underground and still active, for all the photos have to say about such matters. One way or the other the photos seem to say nothing.

Well, that just about does the tour of Mars. One thing totally obvious, because of what is clearly seen in the principles of virtual stereoscopic 3-D, is that we have not been alone in the Universe. Anyone who still thinks there is only themselves, Earth, and god, is foolishly deluded. The originators of the artifacts on Mars may be like ourselves and therefore have to be migrators at some past time.

Certainly, there are similarities in intelligence applied to practical problem-solving in technology in that our intelligence can recognize the shapes and uses of the Mars formulas, but the design principles are outside of human scope at this moment in human time.

PACE – Planetary Association for Clean Energy, Ottawa, Canada.

Greydon Moore

November 17, 1996

Leave a Reply