Scared of Being Exposed, Saudis Demand US Court Reject Lawsuit Showing They Funded 9/11

By Matt Agorist New York, NY — Last year, for the first time since that fateful September morning 16 years ago, families of victims of the 9/11 terror attacks used a new law to go after Saudi Arabia in lawsuits for their role in the attacks. After evidence was revealed during the lawsuit showing the Saudi Arabian embassy in Washington may have funded a “dry run” for the hijackings carried out by two Saudi employees, Saudi Arabia went into panic mode. They are now attempting to use their pull inside the United States to have the lawsuits thrown out. “The 9/11 victims’ families and survivors have submitted dozens of declassified FBI reports and affidavits regarding Saudi involvement in the attacks so it shouldn’t surprise anyone that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and its high-priced lawyers are still trying to hide behind baseless procedural arguments,” said Terry Strada, national chair for […] Read More

2017: How To Defeat The Globalist System: “The Elites Hope To Streamline Tyranny… They Need Crisis And Calamity”

This article was originally published by Brandon Smith of Alt Market In my last two articles, ‘How Globalists Predict Your Behavior’ and ‘How To Predict The Behavior Of Globalists’, I explained the base fundamentals behind a concept with which most people are unfamiliar. They are so unfamiliar with it, in fact, that I didn’t bother to name it. In this article, I hope to explain it, but I highly recommend people read the previous articles in this series before moving forward. What I outlined, essentially, was a beginner’s course on 4th Generation Warfare. This methodology is difficult to summarize, but here I will list what I believe are some of its core tenets. Fourth Gen warfare is based on a primary lesson within Sun Tzu’s The Art Of War. Sun Tzu argues in the classical military tome that the greatest strategists win wars by NOT fighting, or at least, by not fighting their opponents openly and directly. […] Read More

Two-Year Study Finds No Possible Way Fire Could’ve Brought Down World Trade Center Building 7

Two planes hit the World Trade Center complex on September 11, 2001, but three buildings fell. It’s one of the littlest known facts of 9/11. The twin towers weren’t the only buildings to collapse at free fall speed into their own footprints that day. Despite having never been hit by a plane or even being located directly next to the twin towers, much later in the day Building 7 came down too, although the excuses for exactly why it fell have never really made any sense. Well, now a two-year study out of University of Alaska Fairbanks proves that “office fires” could not have brought down the building as the U.S. government has claimed. Activist Post reports: When their study concludes in April 2017, Hulsey and his team will allow a panel of experts to analyze the data and submit the study to peer-reviewed journals. The researchers are promising […] Read More

EU Scientific Study: WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition

A European scientific study has concluded that on September 11, 2001, the Twin Towers were brought down by a controlled demolition. The study, conducted by four physicists and published in Europhysics Magazine (page 23), says that “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.” Wnd.com reports: “Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities,” the four physicists conclude. The study is the work of Steven Jones, former full professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries, and Ted Walter, the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, […] Read More

The 9/11 Pentagon Attack: Planes Simply Do Not Vaporize – Why Didn’t They Show Us the Wreckage?

The 9/11 Pentagon Attack: Planes Simply Do Not Vaporize – Why Didn’t They Show Us the Wreckage? As each day passes, more and more Americans are becoming aware of the startling evidence that clearly contradicts the official explanation of Sept.11th, 2001 offered by the Bush administration. In fact, as more and more evidence comes to light, incongruities in the official explanation become increasingly and undeniably apparent. Ironically, the growing number of people new to these unexplained discrepancies poses a new problem for those of us who have been researching 9/11 for many months or years. We will have to find a way to explain the many complexities related to the attacks to those who now doubt the official version of events. We are faced with the overwhelming task helping great numbers of people understand the many contradictions in the 9/11 story they were fed by their government. Obviously, that […] Read More

Former Bush team member says 9/11 likely inside job

By Greg Szymanski A former chief economist in the Labor Department during President Bush’s first term now believes the official story about the collapse of the WTC is bogus’, saying it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. “If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an ‘inside job’ and a government attack on America would be compelling,” said Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D., a former member of the Bush team who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX. Reynolds, now a professor emeritus at Texas A&M University, also believes it s ‘next to impossible’ that 19 Arab terrorists alone outfoxed the mighty U.S military, adding the scientific conclusions about the WTC collapse may hold the key to the entire […] Read More

Physicist’s Letter On 911 PHYSICS To Rocky Mountain News

The following letter was sent by Eric Harrington, a physicist who lives in Ojai, CA, to Vincent Carroll at the Rocky Mountain News… Dear Mr. Carrol,I am responding to your article slandering the legitimate questions posed by numerous scientists, engineers, pilots, even international (often Republican) politicians regarding the flaws in the “official account” of 9/11. “Let us dip our toe again into” a couple of the bogus rebuffs posed by the “experts” at Popular Mechanics.Pop Mech- “As the fires blazed and the temperatures rose within the buildings, NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) believes, the remaining core columns (those not severed by the planes during impact) softened and buckled, transferring most of the load to the building’s outer structural columns. The floors . . . began to sag from the heat, pulling those columns inward and adding to the burden on the outer columns.”Debunking: For anyone who as actually […] Read More

5 Reasons to Question the Official 9/11 Story

(1) While the government has consistently stated that it did not know where the aircraft were before they struck, the Secretary of Transportation testified before the 9/11 Commission that Vice President Cheney monitored flight 77 for many miles as it approached the Pentagon and — when a military man asked “do the orders still stand?” — Cheney responded affirmatively: “The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to, “The plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the vice president, “Do the orders still stand?” And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?” http://www.911truthmovement.org/video/ hamilton_win.wmv (video of testimony) (2) The tape of interviews of air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 was intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting […] Read More